Here you will find more details on each search method. Each method has its drawbacks, so combining multiple approaches will lead to the most complete grey literature coverage.
Google provides access to a huge number of potential grey literature sources, and does not require a priori knowledge of where on the internet they are located.
Poor reproducibility: Search results depend on browser version, search history, and geographic location.
Search results are too numerous to screen, so a stopping rule is needed.
Search strings cannot be too long or complex (max 150 words, does not support parentheses), so will need to simplify and possibly run multiple searches with different combinations of terms and document each one.
See also this e-learning module from Radboud University, Smarter Searches with Google.
Google Scholar indexes any webpages that meet its specific criteria (e.g. includes title page, author list, reference list) and contains a large amount of grey literature as well as traditional publications from all fields of study.
See this list of databases as a starting point.
Experts can point you in the direction of relevant grey literature sources, including specialist websites, organizations, and unpublished or ongoing studies.
Hand-searching involves browsing a website or printed material to find relevant documents. Researchers who use this method often report that it delivers large number of unique documents [e.g., 2,3].
For a detailed discussion on searching websites, see this 2016 paper by Stansfield, Dickson and Bangpan [5].
For a set of key sources, look at both their reference lists and the articles that cited them, using, for example, Web of Science or Google Scholar. Relevant grey literature is often referred to within traditional articles, as well as in other grey literature.
This method is also known as Snowballing – see this Radboud University guide on Literature Searching at the Nijmegen School of Management for more details.
1. Haddaway NR, Collins AM, Coughlin D, Kirk S. The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138237. [link]
2. Mahood Q, Van Eerd D, Irvin E. Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits. Res Synth Methods. 2014;5(3):221-34. [link]*
3. Godin K, Stapleton J, Kirkpatrick SI, Hanning RM, Leatherdale ST. Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada. Syst Rev. 2015;4:138. [link]
4. Foster MJ, Jewell ST, editors. Assembling the Pieces of a Systematic Review: A Guide for Librarians. Lanham (MD): Rowman & Littlefield; 2017. [link to RUQuest]*
5. Stansfield C, Dickson K, Bangpan M. Exploring issues in the conduct of website searching and other online sources for systematic reviews: how can we be systematic? Syst Rev. 2016;5:9. [link]
* In order to access starred articles, you must be logged in to your Radboud University account via EduVPN